导语


圣塔菲研究所是我们复杂科学学者心之所向的“圣地”,创立于上世纪80年代。研究所在管理上就没有划分学科部门,不设学科边界,学者们享受在这里和不同背景的学者交流脑洞大开的想法,被称为“没有围墙的研究所”。圣塔菲复杂系统暑期学校(Complex System Sumer School,简称CSSS)更是每年研究所最重要的项目之一。暑期学校有非常紧凑的4周行程,目的在于介绍数学、物理、生命以及社会系统中的复杂行为,主要面向博士研究生、博士后以及其他专业人士,鼓励大家提出关于复杂科学的重要问题。

今年笔者有幸通过了圣塔菲研究所每年一度的暑期学校申请,成为将近50名来自世界各地不同背景的学者中的一员。此时今年的夏令营已经落下帷幕,我希望在此处分享参加夏令营的难忘经验。由于是第一次访问美国,所以其中也有一些对于中美文化差异的讨论。另外在文末我也整理了本次夏令营所有参与分享的学者信息,希望对于申博、申博后或者访问之类活动都会有所帮助。

陶如意 | 作者



夏令营一共持续了4周的时间,而我在此之前已经在圣塔菲待了一个月,对国外的文化和生活有了初步的了解,关于圣塔菲和圣塔菲研究所的分享可以看笔者其他的记录,在此仅介绍和夏令营相关的经历,这也是我第一次深度体验“西方式科研”的经验分享,是否典型不知道,但确实很有趣也很难忘。





Week 1~2




第一周真的是困难模式,一下子要认识50个新人,他们在自我介绍的时候无论是名字还是来自哪里我都很陌生,只有聊到学术领域才又有一些熟悉的感觉。我们刚开始的任务就是认识所有人,了解大家的领域。而且前两周的讲座安排非常满,也非常硬核。

在听了两周课之后,大家私下都在说这个夏令营怎么主题那么多,第一周主要集中在方法论上,涉及到动力学、网络科学、计算理论之类的方法论,而且动力学和网络科学各安排了四次课,到最后已经讲的很深了,涉及到混沌动力学表征、网络模型复杂度之类很前沿的内容。第二周开始就有了更多各个领域的应用,比如我很感兴趣的是一个文化嵌入(embedding)的主题,就是用嵌入技术研究文化演化,既具有普适性又比较贴近生活。除此之外还有生物演化,大模型,以及各类社会系统主题的讨论。我在文末放了相关学者的介绍汇总链接。

这里的教授不仅人均CNS,而且讲课都非常生动,妙语连珠,特别喜欢在讲座里插梗,学生也很随意,有时候听嗨了甚至会吹口哨、拍桌子。如果是很宏观的讲座会很有洞见性,也接得住同学各种大开脑洞的提问;技术性的讲座就很扎实,有时会给我们现推公式。虽然不是所有讲座都能百分百听得懂,但还是会觉得脑子受到了知识的洗礼,很享受整个过程,不会因为听不懂觉得无聊。

这里的整个学术氛围是在鼓励你找“有趣”的东西,而不是“有用”的东西。在project中途check的时候,有一个很重要的问题就是“你是不是觉得这个问题有趣,你是不是享受和你的团队合作”。学生在找问题的时候基本上是脑洞怎么大怎么来,也不会管什么可行性。我们在第一周的时候有一块白板,大家有什么项目的想法就往上贴,对其他人的想法感兴趣就可以在旁边写自己的名字。有的人写“让我们解决气候变暖吧”或者“建立经济学的混沌理论”。我一开始很保守,还想做一些规模法则(scaling)相关的东西,后来受到影响,每天都能产生几个天马行空的idea,这样持续了大约一周时间,project团队就多多少少涌现出来了。而且确实能激发你去思考到底对什么问题感兴趣。

大家在白板上头脑风暴

而等到了具体project的时候,这边的负责人就会开始往回拽,会问一些比如“你想在这周做一些什么事情”,或者“你想怎么开始”之类很实际的问题。如果圣塔菲有相关话题的教授资源,他们会鼓励我们去找xx教授聊。整个过程都是很正向的鼓励和引导,不会感觉有任何的阻力和压力,甚至我还感觉到不希望我们在执行层面走太快,反复强调目标不要定太快,大家不要有压力。

project 的最后是产出一段摘要和一个10分钟的 presentation,从这个层面来说其实只要有一个idea,和初步的执行计划就够了,完全没啥压力,大家只需要关注这个事情是不是真的感兴趣就行。虽然如此,但往期的夏令营大家会建立真正的学术伙伴和学术产出,很多教授都提到在十几年前也参加过夏令营,几年后会和伙伴们真正发表出一些工作。说明鼓励内驱力——而不是短期的产出——长远看才是真正最重要的事情。

我感受最深的一点是学生和教授们的绝对平等。除了讲座进行中大家都很活跃之外,每个讲座结束后都会有一大批学生围上去,有的确实是在问问题,有的其实就是打个招呼说你讲的真好。一个本科生看到West这样的资深老教授也会直呼其名少年老成地说“hey bro 最近怎么样!”。不管是教授还是学生都很松弛,可以把注意力放在他们真正关心的事情上,不存在绝对的权威,也不会觉得你的问题小白,因为确实大家的领域太不同了,所有人都会有小白的时候。

有一个很有意思的现象,尽管当下我们身处西方国家,也接受着西方的文化,在表现上尽量合群,但一旦切换语言,自己文化带来的影响就会从骨子里表现出来。我们有一个教授是韩国人,有一个学生和博士后也是韩国人,在一次聚餐中本来大家都在用英文交流,都是直呼其名说说笑笑氛围很好,教授准备要走了,那三位用韩语说了几句话,可能就带上了敬语,教授走的时候,他们两个齐刷刷向教授鞠了一躬,其他人都很诧异,因为这个行为在这里的氛围下非常奇怪,但是同为亚洲人的我对这种尊上的行为非常能感同身受哈哈。

我们平时住在本地一个叫 India Art Institue America 的大学,给我们提供宿舍和每天的食物,每周五则有机会去圣塔菲研究所交流。第一周大家比较兴奋,主要是参观。第二周由于大家的项目基本上都确定了,就想去研究所找一些教授们聊一聊想法。我的队员直接一封邮件发给一个米勒学者问有没有时间meet(米勒学者在圣塔菲也是神出鬼没的资深学者),这个行为让我很震惊。后来大佬果然比较忙,那天没有出现在研究所。但是夏令营的负责人听说这件事情后,就直接给我们牵线约了一个线上的meet…… 果然只有想不到没有做不到。

另外就是,再次感叹大家真的太爱聊天了,或者说这里的人会把和别人深度聊天看的非常重要。如果你是一个intrinsic的人,那么你可以在生活中选择独处,但还是避免不了需要在工作的时候聊天。就拿科研从业者来说,我之前会觉得大部分时间应该是花在文献调研和实验上,而这部分大多数时候是独立完成的,但是他们的工作节奏是,把大量的时间(大约70%)用来沟通,和各种人沟通,从idea到背景到可行性,然后再花少量的时间用来implement。也就是说,学习、试错,甚至一部分思想实验都可以在沟通中发生,这样的代价是最小的,implement阶段可能就一试一个准。

我之前只是观察到这个现象,但还是有些质疑,这样真的会有什么实质性进展吗。但是切身经历了一个这样的项目,团队每天就聚在一起讨论1小时,每天对课题的框架和目标都会更清晰,等大家完全形成共识之后,发现要做的事情也很清楚了,工作量并不算大。虽然我们在国内也总是在强调沟通的重要性,但感觉大家还是更习惯单打独斗做事情,觉得沟通麻烦或者成本高,其实本质还是沟通的太少了,没建立共识就去做implement的事情是非常常见的,甚至大家觉得是正常的。我想了想其实在国内一方面是没有这样纯粹的学术环境,同时大家也没有这样的习惯。

大型社交活动现象,我们几个疲惫的i人坐在人群角落小型社交

而生活中也extrinsic的人几乎就可以把所有时间都花在社交上了。任何人凑在一起就能迅速展开话题。我的休息是在房间里待一会儿,他们的休息就是一群人在沙发上聊一整晚,然后第二天还可以一大早起来徒步。大家的兴趣爱好也非常广泛,在 discord 里有一个自组织的频道,50人不到的小团队一周之内就出现了写作,篮球,足球,攀岩,音乐,徒步,跑步,社交等等十几个子频道,到现在为止已经出现了一些更小众的斗牛表演、化石、写诗之类的奇怪频道。这一对比好像我的生活非常无聊。

一屏截不全的自组织活动




Week 3~4




如果说前两周的关键词是忙碌、挣扎和脑暴。后两周的关键词就是支持、友谊与自由。

大家的核心生活是project,以及在这个鸟不拉屎的地方找各种方式玩。

在立项阶段就知道有些项目看名字就很好玩。最后果然presentation部分成了大家普遍觉得这次夏令营最精彩的环节,有趣程度甚至超过了大佬学者们的lecture。所以在这个部分我想主要介绍一些有趣的项目,虽然有的不一定“有用”。

我自己参与了两个项目,都是最小规模的3人团队,这个规模对我来说交流起来比较舒服。一个项目是经济系统和混沌系统的关系,和两个来自沙特的经济学家组队。这个team不管是沟通还是规划上都非常丝滑,他俩主要聚焦问题,我主要提供技术支持,我的目标是想学习下如何在一个时间序列中检测混沌性的技术,另外也很好奇的是,经济系统和混沌理论的结合在圣塔菲研究所成立的时候挺时髦的,现在到底进展如何。最后初步的结论是经济系统可以看做是确定性过程下受到随机事件影响的动力系统,至于这个确定性过程是不是混沌的,确实很难下定论,不同的序列结论都会不同。另外他俩之前居然都不知道Brain Arthur,最后在我强烈安利加上Arthur自己的人格魅力,他俩都成了Arthur的粉丝。

左图:混沌理论Team和Aruther交流完后的合影。右图:很巧的是在听完Arthur介绍经典的El Forol酒吧的问题之后,他俩居然还在El Forol酒吧偶遇了Arthur,太有纪念意义了……嫉妒使我变形

我的另一个项目是观点极化建模问题。我一直对这类社会观念的话题很感兴趣,这次有一个小伙伴带着很明确的实际场景以及对应的数据,想要建模美国的观点极化现象,所以我大概听了听就决定加入了。不过虽然这个话题很有意思,但是团队的两个小伙伴是我们这个集体少数学术背景不多的人,一个是高中老师,一个是工程师。所以虽然目标很宏大,拿着全美的人口数据,以及每个州的观点统计数据,但在执行层面我算是最了解模型的人了。我们把问题简化再简化,最后调研到了一个很适合建模极化现象的动力学,在我非常痛苦地coding以及小伙伴负责画饼和提供情绪价值的分工下,实现了一个基本的演化模型。

左图:观点极化Team一起hiking的合影。右图:我在厚着脸皮pre一个烂烂的结果的场景


我自己的两个项目算是中规中矩的跨学科课题,而有的人的策略是选一个正常的,再选一个好玩的。所以其实还有一些非常有趣的项目,我在这里展示几个印象深刻的。

Art-collective-behavior: 这个团队开发了一个网站,上面可以上传很多复杂性相关的互动游戏,比如有一个集体绘画的模块,我也贡献了一块绘画瓷砖;还有人机交互小程序,可以和人的姿势同步放置障碍物,影响鸟群的飞行轨迹;还有一个最有意思的是把生命游戏的棋盘格和一个外接琴键联动,按一个琴键就会同步出现生命游戏的pattern,同时出现不同的声音序列。

网站截图,网址是这个,也是开放给大家可以上传新的东西的:https://maxjerdee.github.io/CSSS-arts/gallery.html


声音同步实验:这个也是一个全员参与的课题,实验的时候每个人都被分配了一个小格子,然后一起发出a——的声音持续几十秒,后续分析声音的音调会不会被周围的人影响。你以为你控制的好,但确实能发现大家的频率在收敛的现象。我觉得控制音准这个变量可能会更合理,不过这个team的可视化和分析做的非常完整,而且大家一起参与实验让这个课题更加有意思。

大模型动力学:这个课题在汇报的时候能发现真没啥东西,后来聊天的时候leader说顾着社交了没花什么时间coding。但我觉得这个思路很好。基本的idea是用动力学方法来研究大模型的输入和输出,比如一个思路是观察自我迭代过程是否有吸引子,可以用结合词向量技术嵌入来看相空间的轨迹。

还有研究love复杂性的,研究科幻小说的,研究诗歌的,研究fashion的等等,奇奇怪怪的课题五花八门。

我心里top 1 的是一个叫Science reduction的课题,倒不是因为这个项目本身做的有多好,而是这个过程我让感受到原来科研汇报还可以这样玩。我的理解大概是想要基于范畴论(category theroy)对大脑的行为进行压缩建模,好吧我其实不知道他们在做什么,但关键是他们团队六个人对他们要做什么也没有统一意见。开场的小伙伴说:“接下去任何一个人在分享的的时候仅代表他个人的看法,其他人不一定会同意,甚至可能完全不理解他在说什么”。于是在主要的分享人在讲的时候,另外5个人在白板旁边,如果对分享人的内容有不同意的地方就在白板上画一笔(类似于我们画正字),比如一位分享者说“这张图片虽然画的非常简单……”剩下的全部五个人在旁边齐刷刷写不同意。最后pre结束后,整个黑板也被画满了。整个pre就像是一个行为艺术,听众也很嗨,大家的欢呼把屋子都要掀翻了。

science reduction

上面这样图就展示了六个人对于问题定义在讨论过程中的分歧,大部分人在最后阶段形成了2个阵营;Gage(最后一条橙线)显示他开始一直都不认同大家的方案,在一次讨论中认可了其中一个,但随后又觉得不够好,于是最后停在了一个奇怪的地方;Ayo(第三条绿线)则在讨论中逐渐迷失,最后也不太懂大家在讨论什么。

很搞笑的是这个项目讲完就轮到我们的观点极化建模,屏幕上一显示opinion porolization, 所有人又嗨了,效果拉满。好吧还是得为他们最后的作业捏一把汗,但不管怎样我超级喜欢这个汇报。




尾声




和这群人几乎形影不离的一个月,大家吃在一起玩在一起工作也在一起,最后几天每次吃饭大家都在感叹一个月的时间过得真快,但同时又觉得好像大家已经是认识了好几年的朋友了一样,因为确实在一起经历了很多事情。在最后几天里居然有了类似于毕业季的矫情情绪,我能感受到很多人都在用力告别,大家来自世界各地,而且专业背景如此不同。有这么一段时光把我们放在这么亲密的环境里,这本来就是一件很神奇的事情,而事实就是分别后很多人可能就再也见不到了。

大家把所有事情都冠上最后一次的名号:最后一次在SFI听讲座,最后一次一起去downtown,最后一次晚餐,最后一次hiking,一直到最后一个presentation,最后一个夜晚,最后一个拥抱。虽然最后也逐渐到了project的截止时间,但大家的团体活动却越来越多,参与的人也越来越多。

倒数第二晚我们有二十几号人一起去了一个车程1.5小时的地方stargazing,天还没黑我们就到了,而且当天的前半夜连月亮都没有。我才发现,原来星星是一颗一颗出现的,开始是最亮的一颗,紧接着第二颗、第三颗……然后我就看到了我一定能记住一辈子的满天繁星。这是任何相机都还原不出来的震撼。我们甚至能很清楚看到星星们在闪烁。东南方向有一大片星云,密集到我一开始还以为那是一片云,我也不确定我是不是看到了银河。

更幸运的是,在一个小伙伴给我们指星座,大家都在很认真抬头看星空的时候,我们的正前方划过了一颗流星!所有人都开始欢呼,很多人都跟我一样是第一次看到流星,我当时的感受是,美好的事情总是会相伴而生。哦,我们还看到了疑似“UFO”的东西,最后查了可能是火箭发射……


这张图是相机长曝光的效果,肉眼看所有的星星都是白色,中间的一条拿望远镜看会发现全是星星。

最后一天,在所有的presentation结束的时候,负责带领我们的老师David给了一个tearing ending,不知道为啥我就开始出现了情绪。一个人待着的时候还好,一旦跟大家在一块,就算是晚上的party,大家在很开心的跳舞,我还是觉得非常难过。我觉得让我很难过的深层原因是,我真的非常羡慕大家的自由,这个自由是来自底层的自我。但我知道自己是一个非常典型的中国学生,而且再加上是女性,所以我没有自信能逃离我所在文化给予我的枷锁,我内心深处知道我在可见的未来里都无法像他们一样自由。而且当我在试图跟其他人聊这个情绪的时候,还没开口我就绷不住要哭了,然后我就觉得很丢脸就没继续说出口,强行把情绪忍下来。讽刺的是我不喜欢自己的感性,这何尝不是又一种枷锁。

感恩这段与众不同的经历,我完全理解了之前大家说的“这段经历可能会改变你一生”的评价,可能他们所指的是学术研究层面的改变,但对我来说的改变可能因为接触到了完全不同的文化而带来价值观层面的触动。这不仅仅是东西方文化的碰撞,同时也是当前我们这一代中国学生面临的旧与新的碰撞。到底鼓励个性会给我们带来什么,是更多的冲突还是更大的自由,到底什么是冲突,什么又是自由。这个ending可能有点突兀,但我还是想停在这里,学术的探索,自我的探索,一切都未完待续。





圣塔菲暑期夏令营学者介绍 week 1-2
本文是参加圣塔菲研究所夏令营学者介绍。这更多是一份学习资料,因为我自己也总是会经常回看这些学者的信息,特整理于此,不过这份文档会由于笔者的学术背景带一些主观详略的选择和评论,但我相信对于复杂科学的学习者们来说也是很好的资料。

  1. Porter Swentzell (indigenous culture)

Porter Swentzell 是研究印第安文化的学者,作为第一个讲座因为跟我的背景差的有点多,我其实没太跟上,大致了解是在研究新墨西哥州不同印第安文化的异同。邀请他作为第一个分享可能是因为我们在新墨西哥州吧,这个地方确实土著文化比较鲜明。
YouTube: A Generational Shift: Exploring Citizenship and Identity

  1. Liz Bradley (Nonlinear dynamics)

Professor at the University of Colorado Boulder, Ph.D. in electrical engineering and computer science, all from the MIT,很硬核的学术背景,还作为赛艇队成员休学参加过1988年的奥运会,超酷!
Homepage:https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/elizabeth-bradley
keyword: Nonlinear dynamics, Computer science, time-series analysis, and control theory
这可能是最受大家喜欢的讲座之一,很硬核但教授讲的很有趣,贡献了4节课,除了有很基本的动力学概念,混沌的充分必要条件之类,到后面也有很前沿的进展,比如用混沌理论生成舞蹈和音乐,结合机器学习对混沌系统预测等等。她在圣塔菲 YouTube 频道有非线性动力学的慕课。

  1. Jacob Foster (LLMs, NLP)

Associate Professor of Sociology at UCLA, specializing in computational sociology.
keyword: social production of collective intelligence, the evolutionary dynamics of ideas, and the interplay between culture and cognition,machine learning
这个老师研究的话题非常广,而且都很有意思,他的讲座是我个人最喜欢。感觉他是少数的希望能够把所有的社会学科话题放到一起讨论,并且试图建立共性的社会学家。他这次主要分享了用嵌入(embedding)研究文化演化,第一次分享讨论了概念上文化的定义,我们可以选择如何建模,第二次分享具体介绍了概念嵌入的技术,我的理解和普通的词嵌入技术的区别在于有层级结构,不同词所处的层级是不同的。然后做了一系列神奇的统计,比如性别 vs. 死亡。
Links:
  • Article: From Thin to Thick: Toward a Politics of Human-Compatible AI

  • Article: Can AI and creativity coexist?


  1. Laurent Hébert-Dufresne (networks)

Associate professor of computer science at the University of Vermont, Vermont Complex Systems Center
Keyword: complexity science and network theory.
网络科学是跑不掉的,参与的学生也有很多是网络科学背景的(甚至我们这里有两个纽曼的学生),比较喜欢的一点是教授没有讲很简单的东西,而且除了各种我们熟知的应用之外,还做了一系列网络生成模型的复杂度研究(出乎我意料的网络科学居然还有理论可以研究)。

  1. Rajiv Sethi (fairness)

Prominent economist and professor at Barnard College, Columbia University.
keyword: stereotypes, segregation, communication, and inequality.
有一本据说很有名的书《Shadows of Doubt: Stereotypes, Crime, and the Pursuit of Justice》。话题是挺有意思的,但是口音有点重,而且讲美国大选预测的时候为啥又突然牵扯到买入卖出,没有特别理解这个背后的机制。

  1. Cris Moore (computation)

Prominent researcher in the field of complex systems and theoretical computer science, currently a professor at the Santa Fe Institute.
Keyword: intersection of mathematics, physics, and computer science. His work includes studies on quantum computing, phase transitions in NP-complete problems, social networks, and Bayesian inference.
这位学者是圣塔菲常驻学者,我之前基本上每天都能看到他。写过合著书《The Nature of Computation》(with Stephan Mertens)。他也是会用很多跨学科的方法来解决各种物理问题和社会问题的典范。这次讲座主要就是分享了计算理论的一些基本内容,很巧的是刚听完讲座那天集智公众号就推了很类似的内容《计算复杂性理论50年:从P与NP问题到元复杂性》。
Article: Computational Complexity in Physics
Overview: Algorithmic Justice
SFI Bio: Cris Moore

  1. Stephanie Forrest (biocomputation and security)

Professor at Arizona State University, where she directs the Biodesign Center for Biocomputing, Security, and Society. Additionally, she is an external faculty member at the Santa Fe Institute.
Keyword: computer science and complexity science. primarily focuses on adaptive systems, encompassing areas such as genetic algorithms, computational immunology, biological modeling, automated software repair, and cybersecurity (Wikipedia) (ASU News).
这是一个喜欢结合生物系统方法来解决计算机科学领域问题的科学家。比如她就介绍了Scaling law在芯片的应用,并且也有一个数学模型来建模芯片网络,这是我以前不知道的。另外还有借鉴免疫系统设计异常侵入算法之类的。
Article: How computer science is harnessing the power of Darwinian transformation

  1. Melanie Moses (robotics)

Prominent complexity scientist (professor in the Department of Computer Science at the University of New Mexico)
Keyword: known for her work at the intersection of biology, computer science, and complex systems.
这位学者专注于理解复杂适应系统的原理,和上面提到的学者Stephanie是很紧密的合作伙伴,Stephanie提供计算机背景,Melanie就提供生物背景。当年的生物Scaling law她也是核心参与者,随后和Stephanie合作建立了芯片领域的Scaling law。她的讲座主要介绍了集群智能。
focuses on understanding the principles of complex adaptive systems, particularly how biological systems like ant colonies, human physiology, and disease dynamics can inform and inspire the design of scalable and efficient computational systems. Her work often bridges multiple disciplines, including biology, computer science, and ecology.
Key Contributions:
  • Scaling Laws: Moses has contributed significantly to the study of scaling laws in biology, which describe how various characteristics of organisms (such as metabolic rate, lifespan, and growth patterns) change with size.

  • Biological Inspiration for Computation: She explores how principles from biological systems, such as ant colony foraging behaviors and cellular networks, can be applied to improve algorithms and network designs in computer science.

  • Public Health and Disease Dynamics: Her research also extends to modeling the spread of infectious diseases, providing insights into how disease outbreaks can be managed and mitigated.

Prof Moses also leads the the Moses Biological Computation Lab, and here are some of the projects:
VolCAN
SimCov
Swarmathon
MARIAM
NASA Minds: Project ChiliHouse

  1. Dave Feldman (scaling)

Professor at the College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor, Maine.
Keyword: Complex systems, chaos theory and nonlinear dynamics. Feldman is the author of the textbook “Chaos and Fractals: An Elementary Introduction.
Dave是这次夏令营负责统筹的教授,人很nice,看资料写的研究是动力学,但他这次主要分享了Scaling和Power law如何科学统计。可能是太忙了随便分享一下(不是

  1. Andre de Roos (population structure)

Prominent ecologist and theoretical biologist known for his work in the field of theoretical ecology, particularly in the study of population and community ecology. Professor at the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.
Keyword: dynamics of structured populations, complex interactions within ecosystems through mathematical models and theoretical approaches. life history theory, size-structured population dynamics
这个老师在听他讲座的时候我还真没有放很多的注意力。因为他的讲座主要讲了一个他自己的种群模型,引入种群结构和整体种群数量的影响进行建模,在我看来就太生态学了,很多细节都不太能跟得上。但是现在回顾的时候发现还是很有东西,这个教授的研究视角确实非常系统,以下是他在人口结构方面的相关学术贡献,还是能看到很多熟悉的分析工具的。
Key themes relating to his work on population structure:
  • Size-Structured Population Dynamics: De Roos has extensively studied how differences in individual size within a population affect ecological interactions and population dynamics. He explores how growth, reproduction, and mortality rates vary with size and how these differences influence population stability and resilience.

  • Ontogenetic Development: He examines how the developmental stages of organisms (ontogeny) impact population dynamics. For instance, how different life stages (e.g., juvenile vs. adult) compete for resources differently and how this affects population growth and structure.

  • Individual-Based Models: De Roos often uses individual-based models (IBMs) to simulate the behavior and interactions of individual organisms within a population. These models help in understanding how individual variability and local interactions scale up to affect population-level patterns.

  • Trophic Interactions and Food Webs: His work includes studying how size-structured populations interact within food webs, particularly predator-prey dynamics. He investigates how the size and stage structure of both predators and prey influence community composition and ecosystem stability.

  • Evolutionary Ecology: De Roos also explores how evolutionary processes shape population structure. This includes examining how life history traits evolve in response to environmental pressures and how these evolutionary changes affect population dynamics.

Links: André de Roos – Dynamics of within-population structure stabilise complex ecological communities

  1. Melanie Mitchell (artificial intelligence)

Prominent computer scientist at Portland State University and professor known for her contributions to the field of complexity science, artificial intelligence, and cognitive science.
Keyword:Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, Genetic algorithms, complex systems, and her efforts to explain and popularize the science of complexity to a broader audience.
这位我应该不用多做介绍了吧。经典科普书《An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms》,《复杂》(不是那本传记)的作者。近几年还写过《AI3.0》,她自己的主要研究领域主要是人工智能,但主要是沿袭了她的导师之一侯世达的理念(她的另一位导师就是约翰·霍兰),认为“类比”而不是“连接”才是智能产生的核心。所以她一方面带着学生继续在开发新的人工智能算法,据说用两三条数据就能获得很好的效果,但这方面的工作目前还没有发表,我只是和她的学生聊过几次,所以也不清楚具体细节;另一方面她还做了很多大模型推理能力测试的工作,证明大模型其实并不具备概念空间上的推理。这次的讲座也主要是这个方面的内容。
Key Contributions
Genetic Algorithms: Mitchell has conducted significant research on genetic algorithms, which are search heuristics inspired by the process of natural selection. Her work in this area has contributed to the understanding and development of algorithms that can solve optimization and search problems.
Complex Systems: She has made substantial contributions to the study of complex systems, which are systems composed of many interacting parts that exhibit collective behavior and emergent properties not evident from the behavior of individual parts.
Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science:Her research extends to understanding the principles of intelligence and developing computational models that mimic cognitive processes.
出于AI话题在国内的热门程度,再多放一些信息。以下是米歇尔在AI方面主要关注的话题:
  • “Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans” (2019):
  • In this book for general audiences, Mitchell covers various AI methodologies, including machine learning, neural networks, and genetic algorithms, and discusses their applications and impacts on society.
  • Mitchell emphasizes the importance of understanding what AI can and cannot do, debunking common myths and clarifying misconceptions about the field.
  • Complexity and AI:
  • Mitchell frequently explores the intersection of complexity science and AI. She examines how principles from complexity science, such as emergence and self-organization, can inform the development of more robust and flexible AI systems.
  • Her research includes studying how AI systems can model and understand complex, dynamic environments and how they can exhibit adaptive behaviors.
  • Challenges and Limitations of AI:
  • Mitchell critically examines the limitations of current AI technologies, particularly in terms of generalization and understanding. She discusses issues such as the brittleness of AI systems, their lack of common sense, and their difficulty in transferring knowledge across different domains.
  • She argues that achieving human-like intelligence in machines requires addressing these fundamental challenges and developing AI systems that can understand and interact with the world more like humans do.
  • Ethics and Societal Impact:
  • Mitchell also writes about the ethical and societal implications of AI. She highlights concerns about job displacement, privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and the potential for AI to be used in harmful ways.
  • She advocates for responsible AI development and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the ethical and societal challenges posed by AI technologies.
Links(这个讲座很值得一看):
  • Melanie Mitchell Presents “The Future of Artificial Intelligence”(YouTube)


  1. Hyejin Youn (innovation)

Professor of management at the Kellogg School at Northwestern.
keyword: Complex Systems, Urban Studies, Economic Geography, Innovation and Knowledge Networks
这位教授是一位看着很年轻的韩国人,讲座内容主要是用网络科学研究关于劳动力和创新之间的关系,应该就是上面列的最后一个关键词,没记错的话应该也是个正刊。而且她来分享的第一句就是今天早上收到了 Nature Humen Behavior的录用通知(还得是网络科学)。现在回看资料发现原来这个老师也研究城市scaling law啊。
key areas:
  • Complex Systems: She investigates how complex systems, such as cities and economies, evolve and function. Her work often employs network theory and statistical physics to understand the underlying mechanisms driving these systems.

  • Urban Studies: Youn’s research in urban studies focuses on the dynamics of cities, including their growth, development, and the interactions between different urban factors. She examines how cities innovate and how their economic and social networks evolve over time.

  • Economic Geography: She explores the spatial distribution of economic activities and how this affects regional development. Her work often looks at the scaling laws that describe how different characteristics of cities, such as infrastructure and productivity, change with size.

  • Innovation and Knowledge Networks: Youn studies how knowledge is generated and disseminated within and between organizations and regions. She analyzes the patterns of innovation and the factors that drive the success and diffusion of new ideas and technologies.

Notable Contributions:
  • Research on Urban Scaling: One of Youn’s significant contributions is her work on urban scaling laws, which describe how various characteristics of cities change predictably with their size. This includes factors like infrastructure, economic productivity, and social activity.


  1. Naeve O’Clery (economics)

Prominent researcher and professor at the University College London. Her work focuses on the application of data science and network theory to understand economic development, urban dynamics, and the spatial distribution of economic activities.
Keyword: Complex systems, economic geography, and urban studies.
我对这位老师的印象也不是很深了,可能是一周快结束了有点累了……

Research Focus:

  • Economic Complexity and Development:
  • She explores how economic complexity—the diversity and sophistication of a region’s economic activities—affects economic growth and development. Her work often involves creating and analyzing economic complexity indices to understand the drivers of regional and national prosperity.
  • Urban Dynamics and Spatial Analysis:
  • O’Clery investigates the factors that influence urban growth, development, and the spatial distribution of economic activities within cities. She uses network theory and spatial analysis to model and understand these dynamics.
  • Network Theory:
  • She applies network theory to study various aspects of economic and urban systems, such as the flow of goods and services, innovation networks, and the structure of economic interactions.
  • Data Science and Machine Learning:
  • O’Clery integrates data science techniques and machine learning with traditional economic and urban theories to derive insights from large and complex datasets. Her interdisciplinary approach helps to reveal patterns and trends that are not immediately obvious through conventional methods.
Notable Contributions
  • Economic Complexity Index (ECI): O’Clery has contributed to the development and refinement of the Economic Complexity Index, which measures the knowledge intensity of economies and helps to predict economic growth and development.

  • Research on Urban Scaling Laws: Similar to Hyejin Youn, O’Clery has explored how urban characteristics scale with city size, providing insights into infrastructure needs, economic productivity, and social dynamics.


  1. Thalia Wheatley (collective emotions)

Professor of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Dartmouth College.
Keyword: understanding how people connect and communicate, studying topics such as social interactions, emotions, and the neural basis of empathy. Wheatley uses methods like functional MRI (fMRI) to explore how the brain processes social information and how these processes underpin human connection and communication. Her work aims to unravel the complexities of social behavior and the brain’s role in facilitating interpersonal relationships.
这个学者的研究都很好玩,作为一个物理学家拿着一堆脑电数据研究社交网络。一个研究是拿社交网络和脑电数据做一个对应,然后发现你的三阶朋友脑电序列和你是负相关的(具体什么区域的序列我也不太记得了);另一个研究是研究真实的对话数据,观察参与对话的人感受到的“连接感”和对话模式(对话间隔之类的)的关系,还能通过嵌入技术观察可视化每段对话的“轨迹”。

  1. Andreas Wagner (fitness)

Prominent evolutionary biologist (Institute of Evolutionary Biology at the University of Zurich)
keyword:Evolutionary innovation, robustness, and the adaptability of biological systems. His interdisciplinary research combines principles from biology, physics, and computer science to explore how complex biological systems evolve and function.
这个学者主要的关键词应该就是适应性。所有的适应过程都有一个landscape,无论是生物还是社会系统,演化过程都是在这个landscape找到某种局部最优。这个视角确实也是很普适,讲座介绍了很多数学细节,以及符合这个适应过程的例子,比如可以解释生物多样性等等。很硬核。
Key Themes in Wagner’s Work on Fitness
  • Fitness Landscapes:

  • Wagner has explored the concept of fitness landscapes, which represent the relationship between genotypes (or phenotypes) and their reproductive success. In these landscapes, different genetic variations correspond to different levels of fitness, and evolution can be seen as a process of navigating this landscape to find higher fitness peaks.

  • He examines how the structure of fitness landscapes influences evolutionary pathways and the potential for populations to reach optimal fitness configurations.

  • Robustness and Evolvability:

  • Wagner investigates how robustness (the ability of organisms to maintain function despite genetic mutations) and evolvability (the capacity of organisms to generate adaptive genetic variation) impact fitness.

  • He discusses how robust genetic networks can facilitate evolvability by allowing organisms to explore new evolutionary pathways without losing their current adaptive functions.

  • Genotype-Phenotype Mapping:

  • Wagner’s work often delves into the mapping between genotypes and phenotypes and how this affects fitness. He explores how different genetic configurations can result in similar fitness outcomes and how this redundancy can promote evolutionary innovation.

  • Evolutionary Innovation:

  • In his book “Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle” (2014), Wagner discusses how novel traits and functions arise in biological systems. He argues that the ability of organisms to innovate is crucial for fitness and survival in changing environments.

  • Wagner presents the idea that genetic networks and the vastness of genotype space provide the raw material for evolutionary innovation, allowing populations to discover new fitness peaks.

  • Neutral Networks:

  • Wagner introduces the concept of neutral networks, which are sets of genotypes that produce the same phenotype and have the same fitness. These networks allow populations to drift neutrally across genotype space, facilitating the discovery of new adaptive mutations without a loss in fitness.

  • He emphasizes the importance of neutral networks in maintaining genetic diversity and enabling adaptive evolution.

Links: Article: Evolvability-enhancing mutations in the fitness landscapes of an RNA and a protein

  1. Sara Walker

Associate professor at Arizona State University (ASU), holds appointments in the School of Earth and Space Exploration and the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science. She is also the deputy director of the ASU-Santa Fe Institute Center for Biosocial Complex Systems.
Keyword: astrobiology, theoretical physics, and complexity science. understanding the origins and nature of life, both on Earth and elsewhere in the universe, through the lens of complex systems.
Sara也算是个网红科学家(?),我还看过她的TED讲座,这次她讲座内容框架也是比较大,主题是theory of narrative, 分别划分了narrative of physics, reality and imagination. 最后介绍了Assembly theory(组装理论),除了模块化组间搜索降低可能性空间之外,她还有一个因果机制的引入,还是值得仔细看看这个理论的,而且她每次的叙事都会和寻找外星人联系在一起。
Walker’s research is highly interdisciplinary, encompassing several key areas:
  • Origins of Life:

  • Walker studies the fundamental processes that lead to the emergence of life. She explores how chemical systems transition from non-living to living states, focusing on the role of information and computation in this transition.
  • Her work aims to identify universal principles underlying the origin of life, which could inform the search for life beyond Earth.
  • Complex Systems and Information Theory:

  • She investigates how complex systems, such as biological organisms and ecosystems, process and store information. Walker examines how these systems maintain organization and adapt to changing environments.
  • Her research often uses concepts from information theory to understand the flow and transformation of information in biological systems.
  • Astrobiology:

  • Walker is involved in the search for extraterrestrial life, using her understanding of life’s origins and complexity to guide the search for biosignatures (indicators of life) on other planets.
  • She explores how the principles of life on Earth can be applied to the search for life in the universe, considering both biochemical and alternative forms of life.
  • Fundamental Physics and Life:

  • She looks at the intersection of physics and biology, exploring how the laws of physics underpin the properties and behaviors of living systems.

  • Her research addresses fundamental questions about the nature of life, including how physical laws can give rise to biological complexity.

Links:
Interview: Zocalo: “We live on a really amazing planet”





圣塔菲暑期夏令营学者介绍 week 3-4
后面两周的讲座密度降低,留给了我们更多project的时间,共10位学者。而且各种讲座实在是太多样了,学生私下也在交流,其实很多跟自己太不相关的领域实在是很难跟上,也没有什么兴趣,而且加上强度比较大,还需要做project,所以逐渐从第三周开始大家就会选择性听讲座,而不是全勤了。
我可能是因为学的是方法,感觉每个讲座多多少少都能跟上一些,但还是翘了两个pannel,这种group conversation对我来说还是太跳跃了,感觉抓不到重点。下面就是剩余的9位学者相关资料。我就不对所有学者评论了,因为有些就是没听懂哈哈。

  1. Fernanda Valdovinos (ecological networks)

Fernanda Valdovinos is a prominent ecologist and complex systems scientist at the University of Michigan known for her research on ecological networks, particularly focusing on mutualistic interactions between species, such as pollination networks. Her work combines theoretical modeling, empirical data, and network theory to understand the structure, dynamics, and stability of ecological communities.
这位学者主要是用复杂网络的方法分析生态系统,包括二分网,多层网络等,关注系统的稳健性。主要是所有的数据都是他们团队自己收集的。
Key Conclusions from Fernanda Valdovinos’s Research on Ecological Networks
  • Importance of Network Structure:

  • Nestedness and Modularity: Valdovinos has concluded that the structure of ecological networks, particularly their nested and modular organization, plays a crucial role in their stability and resilience. Nested networks, where specialist species interact with a subset of the species that generalists interact with, tend to be more stable. Modularity, where networks are divided into relatively independent sub-networks, can also enhance resilience by containing perturbations within modules.

  • Mutualistic Interactions and Ecosystem Stability:

  • Stability and Biodiversity: Her research indicates that mutualistic interactions, such as those between pollinators and plants, contribute significantly to ecosystem stability. These interactions enhance biodiversity and the resilience of ecosystems to environmental changes and disturbances.

  • Adaptive Foraging: Valdovinos has shown that adaptive foraging behavior of pollinators, where they switch between flower species based on availability, can stabilize pollination networks. This behavior helps buffer the network against fluctuations in the abundance of individual species.

  • Impacts of Environmental Changes:

  • Human Activities: She has studied how human activities, such as habitat destruction, climate change, and the introduction of invasive species, disrupt ecological networks. These disruptions can lead to declines in biodiversity and ecosystem services.
  • Network Responses to Disturbances: Valdovinos’s models predict how ecological networks respond to various disturbances. She has found that networks with greater biodiversity and more complex interaction patterns are generally more resilient to changes.
  • Predictive Modeling:
  • Dynamic Models: Valdovinos has developed dynamic models of pollination networks that incorporate the behavior of individual species and their interactions. These models help predict how changes in one part of the network can affect the entire system, providing valuable tools for conservation and management.

  • Conservation Strategies: Her work emphasizes the importance of preserving both species and their interactions to maintain ecosystem functions. Effective conservation strategies should focus on protecting the network structure and the critical species that maintain network integrity.

  • Role of Keystone Species:

  • Critical Species: Valdovinos has identified the role of keystone species—those that have a disproportionately large impact on their environment relative to their abundance. In mutualistic networks, certain pollinators and plants act as keystone species whose presence is crucial for the stability and functioning of the network.


  1. Chris Kempes (origins of life)

Chris Kempes is a researcher who has contributed significantly to the study of the origins of life, often focusing on the physical and biological principles that underlie life’s emergence. His work typically integrates concepts from physics, biology, and complexity science to explore how life arises and evolves.
Chris 是我们组长期的合作者了,但我还从来没有听过他讲他的研究。他分享了两个主题,一个是scaled growth theory, 也就是我们team在企业生长方向一起合作的这套框架,他主要介绍了生物生长,我才知道原来这套框架已经在90年代的基础上有了更多的发展,而且在一些生物模型上也出现了生长的“奇点”。我在分享结束后要来了文献打算好好研读一下。而且他还分享了我们企业的工作,还cue到了我说大家有问题可以找我讨论,满足了我的虚荣心哈哈好。另外他还分享了生命起源的理论,更多的是在理论层面的图景,这部分的工作他主要和Sara Walker有很多的合作。我感觉他分享的主题都非常酷,这种general又不空泛的理论就非常吸引我。
Key Themes in Kempes’s Work on the Origins of Life
  • Universal Principles of Life:

  • Kempes seeks to identify universal principles that govern the emergence and organization of life. This involves understanding the fundamental physical and chemical constraints that all living systems must obey, regardless of their specific biology.
  • He explores how these principles can apply not only to life on Earth but also to potential life forms elsewhere in the universe.
  • Complexity and Life’s Emergence:

  • Kempes investigates how complexity arises in biological systems and the role it plays in the origins of life. He examines how simple chemical and physical interactions can lead to the complex structures and behaviors characteristic of living organisms.

  • His research often focuses on the transition from non-living to living matter, exploring how complexity and organization emerge spontaneously under certain conditions.

  • Metabolic Scaling Laws:

  • One of Kempes’s key contributions is the study of metabolic scaling laws, which describe how metabolic rates change with the size of an organism. He explores how these scaling laws can be applied to understand the constraints on the size and structure of early life forms.

  • This work helps to explain how metabolic processes scale from single cells to larger, multicellular organisms, providing insights into the evolution of complex life.=

  • Thermodynamics and Life:

  • Kempes examines the thermodynamic principles that underlie life, particularly how living systems maintain organization and complexity despite the second law of thermodynamics, which dictates an increase in entropy.

  • He investigates how energy flow and thermodynamic efficiency are critical to the emergence and sustainability of life.

  • Prebiotic Chemistry:

  • His research includes exploring the chemical pathways that could lead to the formation of life, focusing on the prebiotic chemistry that precedes biological organization.

  • Kempes looks at how simple molecules could assemble into more complex structures capable of metabolism and replication, essential steps in the origin of life.


  1. Marcus Hamilton (evolutionary anthropology)

Macrus Hamilton is an anthropological archaeologist and studys human-environment interactions in hunter-gatherer societies. More broadly, He is interested in the evolutionary diversification of human ecology over deep time and into the present using a variety of methodological approaches including fieldwork, modeling, and data analysis. His research takes an interdisciplinary approach to questions in evolutionary anthropology that explore the embedding of complex human systems in the physical world.
这又是一位老朋友了,也是我们长期合作的team成员,原先的名单上都没有他,所以他来的时候我超级惊喜,一见面也来了一个大大的拥抱。他分享的内容框架比较大,涉及到人类演化以及人类社会复杂性的分析,说实话感觉干货不多,不过我还是私心非常喜欢他的分享,至少ppt贼好看,怕不是一个隐藏的艺术家吧。

  1. Geoffrey West (singularities)

Geoffrey West, a theoretical physicist and complexity scientist, has written extensively about the concept of singularities in the context of cities, companies, and biological organisms. His work primarily focuses on the scaling laws that govern the growth and development of complex systems. Singularities, in his framework, refer to the points at which these systems face crises due to unsustainable growth patterns.
这位就是明星一般的存在了。所有跟他聊过天的人都会喜欢他!而且也是在整个夏令营反复被提到的人,Scaling law的鼻祖人物!而且我发现West讲座的风格和张江老师还挺像的,尤其是在讲奇点的时候,听他讲座亲切感非常强。我就全程迷妹眼,无论他讲啥我都觉得有意思!他主要也是分享了scaling law 背后的机制,满屏幕的公式给了我们一些数学上的震撼,科普性强的同时又不失硬核。不过我始终觉得他的建模框架有些过于硬核了,反正我想了那么久也不知道怎么用他的思路给公司建模(还是我菜)。
Key Concepts in Geoffrey West’s Work on Singularities
  • Scaling Laws:
  • West’s research reveals that many complex systems, including biological organisms, cities, and companies, follow specific scaling laws. These laws describe how various properties of these systems (such as metabolic rate, infrastructure, or innovation) change predictably with size.
  • For example, West has shown that larger organisms and cities tend to be more efficient in their resource use per unit of size, a concept known as “economies of scale.”
  • Superlinear Scaling in Cities:
  • Unlike biological organisms, cities exhibit superlinear scaling for certain socioeconomic properties, such as innovation and economic productivity. This means that as cities grow, these properties increase at a rate faster than the city’s population size.
  • However, this superlinear growth also leads to accelerated resource consumption, pollution, and social challenges, contributing to potential singularities.
  • Finite Time Singularities:
  • West introduces the idea of finite time singularities, where the exponential growth of a system leads to a crisis point or collapse. This concept is particularly relevant for cities and economies, where continuous growth can result in unsustainable pressure on resources and infrastructure.
  • A finite time singularity occurs when a system reaches a point where its current growth model can no longer be sustained, necessitating a significant shift or innovation to avoid collapse.
  • Innovation and Resetting the Clock:
  • To avoid singularities, West argues that systems must innovate to reset the growth trajectory. In the context of cities, this means adopting new technologies, infrastructure, and policies that can support further growth without leading to collapse.
  • This idea parallels biological organisms, where evolutionary innovations allow species to adapt to new environments and challenges, effectively resetting their growth clocks.
  • Implications for Sustainability:
  • West’s insights have profound implications for sustainability. By understanding the scaling laws and potential singularities, policymakers and planners can design interventions that promote sustainable growth.
  • His work emphasizes the need for continuous innovation and adaptation to maintain the balance between growth and resource consumption.

  1. Michael Ralph (economics of slavery)

Michael Ralph (Howard University) is an academic whose work encompasses various aspects of social science, including the economics of slavery. He has contributed to the understanding of how slavery and the slave trade have impacted economic systems historically and continue to influence contemporary economic and social structures.
Key Themes in Michael Ralph’s Work on the Economics of Slavery
  • Economic Impact of Slavery:

  • Ralph examines how slavery contributed to the economic development of nations, particularly focusing on how the exploitation of enslaved people generated wealth for slaveholding societies.

  • He explores the ways in which the labor of enslaved individuals was integral to the profitability of industries such as agriculture, particularly in the production of cash crops like cotton, sugar, and tobacco.

  • Financial Instruments and Slavery:

  • Ralph investigates the financial mechanisms that supported and were supported by the institution of slavery. This includes the use of enslaved people as collateral for loans, the trading of insurance policies on enslaved individuals, and the broader financial markets that developed around the slave trade.

  • He highlights how the commodification of human lives was embedded in financial practices and institutions, influencing modern economic systems.

  • Insurance and Risk Management:

  • One of Ralph’s significant contributions is his exploration of how insurance companies engaged with the economics of slavery. He delves into how enslaved people were insured as property, with policies covering risks like death and injury, thereby integrating human lives into financial risk management practices.

  • His work sheds light on how these practices not only provided economic security for slaveholders but also reinforced the commodification of enslaved people.

  • Legacy of Slavery in Modern Economics:

  • Ralph explores the enduring economic and social legacies of slavery, arguing that contemporary economic disparities and racial inequalities can be traced back to the historical institution of slavery.

  • He discusses how the wealth generated from slavery has been passed down through generations, contributing to persistent racial wealth gaps and influencing modern economic relations.

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis:

  • Ralph employs both quantitative data and qualitative narratives to illustrate the economic dimensions of slavery. He uses economic data, historical records, and personal accounts to provide a comprehensive view of how slavery functioned as an economic system.

  • This approach allows him to demonstrate the human impact of economic practices and policies related to slavery.

Links:
  • Article: The Price of Life: From Slavery to Corporate Life Insurance

  • Sam Scarpino (data and epidemiology)


  1. Samuel V. Scarpino

PhD, is the Director of AI + Life Sciences at Northeastern University and a Professor of the Practice in Health and Computer Sciences. He holds appointments in the Institute for Experiential AI and the Network Science, Global Resilience, and Roux Institutes. In recognition for his contributions to complex systems science, he was named a fellow of the ISI Foundation in 2017, an external Professor at the Santa Fe Institute in 2020, and an external faculty member at the Vermont Complex System Center in 2021.
Prior to joining Northeastern, Scarpino was the Vice President of Pathogen Surveillance at The Rockefeller Foundation, Chief Strategy Officer at Dharma Platform (a social impact, technology startup), and co-founded a data science initiative called Global.health, which was backed by Google and The Rockefeller Foundation. Outside of these roles, he has over 15 years of experience translating research into decision support and data science/AI tools across diverse sectors from public health and clinical medicine to real estate and energy.
Links:
  • Article: New approach to epidemics

  • Article: Wastewater pathogens can inform public health


  1. Amy Wesolowski (epidemiology)

Amy Wesolowski is an epidemiologist and researcher at Johns Hopkins known for her work in the field of infectious disease dynamics, particularly focusing on the use of mobile phone data and other digital technologies to understand human mobility and its impact on the spread of diseases. Her interdisciplinary research combines epidemiology, data science, and computational modeling to inform public health strategies and improve disease control measures.

Research Focus

Wesolowski’s research primarily revolves around several key areas:

  • Human Mobility and Disease Transmission:

  • She studies how human movement patterns influence the spread of infectious diseases. By analyzing mobility data, Wesolowski aims to understand how people’s movements contribute to the geographic spread of pathogens.

  • Her research often utilizes mobile phone data, travel surveys, and other digital data sources to map and model human mobility.

  • Mobile Phone Data in Public Health:

  • Wesolowski is a pioneer in using mobile phone data to track population movements. This innovative approach provides real-time insights into how diseases might spread based on human behavior and movement.

  • This data helps in identifying high-risk areas and times, enabling targeted interventions and efficient allocation of public health resources.

  • Epidemiological Modeling:

  • She develops and applies computational models to simulate the dynamics of infectious diseases. These models incorporate mobility data to predict how diseases will spread and to assess the potential impact of different intervention strategies.

  • Her work covers a range of infectious diseases, including malaria, dengue, influenza, and more recently, COVID-19.

  • Impact of Interventions:

  • Wesolowski’s research also examines the effectiveness of public health interventions, such as vaccination campaigns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures.

  • By modeling various scenarios, she provides evidence-based recommendations for optimizing disease control measures and improving public health outcomes.

Links:
  • Article: Nature: Multinational patterns of seasonal asymmetry


  1. Jean-Paul Faguet (developing economies and societies)

Jean-Paul Faguet is an economist and political scientist at the London School of Economics known for his research on decentralization, development economics, and the political economy of institutions. His work often explores how governance structures and decentralization impact economic development and public service delivery.
Key Themes in Jean-Paul Faguet’s Work on Economies
  • Decentralization and Economic Development:

  • Faguet has extensively studied the impact of decentralization on economic development. He examines how the transfer of power and resources from central to local governments affects economic outcomes and public service delivery.

  • His research indicates that decentralization can lead to more responsive and accountable governance, which in turn can improve public services and economic development. However, the success of decentralization depends on the political and institutional context.

  • Case Studies and Comparative Analysis:

  • Faguet uses detailed case studies and comparative analysis to understand the effects of decentralization. His work often involves in-depth analysis of specific countries or regions to draw broader conclusions about the economic and political impacts of decentralization.

  • For example, his research on Bolivia’s decentralization reforms provides insights into how local governance can improve public investment and service delivery, especially in marginalized areas.

  • Political Economy of Decentralization:

  • He explores the political economy aspects of decentralization, including how political incentives and institutional structures shape the outcomes of decentralization reforms.

  • Faguet’s work highlights the importance of political will, local capacity, and institutional frameworks in determining whether decentralization leads to positive economic outcomes.

  • Governance and Public Services:

  • His research also focuses on the relationship between governance and the provision of public services. Faguet examines how decentralized governance can lead to better-targeted and more efficient public services, particularly in health, education, and infrastructure.

  • He argues that local governments are often better positioned to understand and respond to the needs of their communities, leading to improved service delivery and economic benefits.


  1. Orit Peleg (biological communication signals)

Orit Peleg is a researcher known for her work in the field of bio-inspired robotics, particularly focusing on the study of collective behavior in biological systems and the development of biologically-inspired algorithms for robotics. Her research often touches upon related topics such as swarm behavior, collective decision-making, and emergent communication in animal groups.
Key Themes in Orit Peleg’s Work Related to Biological Communication Signals
  • Collective Behavior in Animal Groups:
  • Peleg studies how animals in groups communicate and coordinate their behaviors to achieve collective goals such as foraging, navigation, and predator avoidance. Her research often involves observing and modeling the interactions between individual animals within groups.
  • By understanding the mechanisms of collective behavior, Peleg seeks to apply these principles to the design of robotic systems capable of coordinating their actions in complex environments.

  • Emergent Communication:

  • She investigates how communication signals emerge spontaneously within animal groups without the need for explicit signaling mechanisms. This includes studying how simple interactions between individuals give rise to complex patterns of behavior and information transfer.

  • Peleg’s research aims to uncover the underlying principles of emergent communication in biological systems and apply them to the design of decentralized communication protocols for robotic swarms.

  • Biologically-Inspired Algorithms for Robotics:

  • Peleg develops algorithms inspired by the collective behaviors observed in nature, including communication strategies used by social animals. These algorithms enable robotic systems to interact with each other and with their environment in ways that mimic the capabilities of biological organisms.

  • Her work contributes to the field of swarm robotics, where groups of robots cooperate and coordinate their actions to achieve tasks that are difficult or impossible for individual robots to accomplish alone.

Links:
  • CU Boulder BioFrontiers Bio


  1. Tom McCarthy (novelist)

Tom McCarthy is a novelist whose work has been translated into more than twenty languages and adapted for cinema, theatre and radio. His first novel, Remainder, won the 2008 Believer Book Award; his third, C, was a 2010 Booker Prize finalist, as was his fourth, Satin Island, in 2015. McCarthy is also author of the study Tintin and the Secret of Literature, and of the essay collection Typewriters, Bombs, Jellyfish. He contributes regularly to publications such as The New York Times, The London Review of Books, Harper’s and Artforum. In 2013 he was awarded the inaugural Windham-Campbell Prize for Fiction. His latest novel, The Making of Incarnation, was published in 2021.
最后是一位小说家,但也是圣塔菲的学者,这个ending着实是很有新意,他主要是写科幻,然后给我们读了两段他自己书的片段。
McCarthy has held Visiting Professorships at the Royal College of Art London, Columbia University New York and Städelschule Frankfurt. In 2019 he guest-curated the exhibition ‘Empty House of the Stare’ at London’s Whitechapel Gallery, and in 2022 will guest-curate a major exhibition, ‘Holding Pattern’, in Kunstnernes Hus Oslo, responding to the art institute’s invitation to explore the themes and motifs of his work. He lives in Berlin, where in 2019 he was a Fellow of the DAAD Artists-in-Berlin programme. Born in Scotland, he is now a Swedish citizen.


作者简介
陶如意,北京师范大学系统科学博士在读。研究方向为复杂系统建模,关注多尺度动力学,规模法则,重整化,深度学习等。

本文首发于作者知乎:https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/707556439


《复杂》:集智团队全新译作


20世纪80年代,美国新墨西哥州的群山沙漠间,一场科学与思维的革命正在酝酿之中。这场科学运动的神经中枢是一个名为圣塔菲研究所的智库。聚集在这里的研究人员形形色色,既有梳着马尾辫的研究生,也不乏诺贝尔奖得主——物理学奖得主默里·盖尔曼和菲利普·安德森,经济学奖得主肯尼斯·阿罗。但他们有一个共同的愿景,那就是探寻一种底层的统一性,一个能揭示自然界和人类世界普遍复杂性的通用理论框架。他们相信,从过去20年在神经网络、生态学、人工智能和混沌理论等领域的智识发酵中,他们已经掌握了创建新框架的数学工具。他们相信,对这些思想的应用使他们能够以全新的方式理解这个世界的运行规律——并有可能对经济、商业甚至政治行为产生巨大影响。他们相信,圣塔菲研究所正在打造第一个严谨的、替代线性还原论思维的方法。
这就是关于他们的故事——如何努力打造“21世纪的科学”的故事。

书中以群像传记的形式,生动记录了复杂科学圣地圣塔菲研究所的诞生时刻。它不仅是一个独树一帜的研究所的故事,更是系统思维的启示录:从对古典主义经济学的颠覆到重新思考达尔文的进化论,从凝聚态物理到迭代囚徒困境,从亚马孙雨林的经济决策到地震的分布规律,从人工智能到遗传算法……本书借众多人物之口描绘了如何跨领域地系统思考,并启示我们:这个世界并非现成地存在着,而是无时无刻不在动态变化,我们唯一要做的就是理解并直面这真实世界中的复杂性。


复杂科学的圣地圣塔菲研究所成立于80年代的美国,米歇尔·沃尔德罗普在以《复杂:诞生于秩序与混沌边缘的科学》一书,描绘了圣塔菲学者们的探索历程,影响了此后一众年轻人的选择。集智俱乐部团队重新翻译的新版《复杂:诞生于秩序与混沌边缘的科学》近期由中信出版社出版。本文既是集智与复杂的缘起,亦是接棒复杂性探索、交融东西方文化的明日。

《复杂:诞生于秩序与混沌边缘的科学》,作者:M.米切尔·沃尔德罗普,译者:集智俱乐部,中信出版集团 2024年2月。


详情请见:《复杂》:从美国圣塔菲到中国的复杂性研究 | 集智团队全新译作

推荐阅读
1. 张江:21世纪为什么需要复杂科学?
2. 吴家睿:圣塔菲研究所与科学的新综合 | 新书《复杂》
3. 罗家德:圣塔菲之路——从复杂科学到复杂思维 | 新书《复杂》
4. 张江:第三代人工智能技术基础——从可微分编程到因果推理 | 集智学园全新课程
5. 集智VIP集合啦!云南线下研修营,与集智创始人一起攀登“复杂性阶梯”
6. 加入集智,一起复杂!